Will President Obama support the Fair Elections Now Act?

This month’s “Money On My Mind” column by Dr. Jay R. Mandle of DemocracyMatters.org paints a fairly gloomy picture of FENA’s near term chances to succeed.  Dr. Mandle discusses the natural reluctance of reform activists to work on process issues such as Clean Elections, because they want to work directly on the issues they are passionate about, and whose outcomes matter to them directly, no matter how long the odds against them.  Mandle thinks Obama, as a liberal reformer, has the same tendency.  Furthermore, he thinks that Obama may be blinded to the need for public financing by his own huge fund raising success outside the presidential public financing system.

Mandle suggests that Obama may become more receptive to the Clean Elections message, and may sign on to FENA, if his reform agenda is sufficiently thwarted by Congress (presumably if he also recognizes that the influence of private money is the main source of his frustration).

These concerns are clearly borne out in the current health care and financial sector reform debates. Much has been made of the fact that there is “no seat at the table” for the single payer health care option, and there is also significant resistance to restoring real regulation to the financial systems. Private political donations will no doubt have a huge impact in both cases.  In fact, private money is probably the only reason for not even discussing the single payer health care solution, which polls have shown is very popular among the general population.
We Clean Elections advocates appear to be hung in limbo at this point: Congress is unlikely to give FENA serious attention unless Obama signs on, and - as Mandle points out - Obama is unlikely to see the need until and unless he learns the hard way that our privately financed Congress can’t act in the country’s best interests.  We can assume that Congress will provide the lesson, but will the President learn it, or will he instead rationalize and settle for whatever legislation he can get passed?
This puts us Clean Elections activists in an awkward position. We can’t in good conscience hope for failures in the health care program or financial sector reform, yet we recognize the bad bargain of losing out on the long term benefits of election finance reform in order to gain the inadequate legislation that our privately financed Congress is likely to pass.
For those of us working in Florida, now is a good time to offer strong support to the Fair Districts referendum initiative.  Not only is the issue critical to increasing democracy in the state, we can also hone our canvassing skills here so that we will be that much more effective in promoting the Clean Elections / FENA issue.  It is also worthwhile, if you haven’t done so already, to write or call your Congressman and both Senators to encourage their support for FENA.
Fred Markham
17 May 2009

, , , , ,

No Comments

Trade

Address of trade subcommittee members:
Committee on Ways and Means
Subcommittee on Trade

Sander M. Levin, MI Chairman

http://www.house.gov/levin/

John S. Tanner, TN

http://www.house.gov/tanner/

Chris Van Hollen, MD
http://vanhollen.house.gov/HoR/MD08/Home

Jim McDermott, WA
http://www.house.gov/mcdermott/

Richard E. Neal, MA
http://www.house.gov/mcdermott/

Lloyd Doggett, TX
http://www.house.gov/doggett/

Earl Pomeroy, ND
http://www.pomeroy.house.gov/

Bob Etheridge, NC
http://etheridge.house.gov/

Linda T. Sanchez, CA
http://lindasanchez.house.gov/

Kevin Brady, TX
http://www.house.gov/brady/

Geoff Davis, KY
http://geoffdavis.house.gov/

Dave G. Reichert, WA

http://reichert.house.gov/

Wally Herger, CA
http://www.house.gov/herger/

Devin Nunes, CA
http://nunes.house.gov/

No Comments

Political Donors Drive the HealthCare Debate

I submitted this as a letter to the editor to several central FL newspapers this morning, in response to an email alert from Howard Dean.

Special interests and big money political donors are driving the health care debate away from public options that would ensure all Americans have access to good healthcare at costs they can afford. The NY Times editorial board wrote earlier this month, “Lobbyists and Congressional aides have discussed a possible compromise: Congress would authorize a new government-run insurance program, but it would come into existence only if certain conditions were met - if, for example, private insurers failed to rein in health costs by a certain amount after several years.” In other words, we have finally arrived at the opportunity to devise a desperately needed public health care option,  only to find that our privately financed legislators are bending to the will of their special interest financiers in the insurance and health care industry. This is no compromise at all, but a political diversion that will continue private insurer control of health care for another generation: a system where public health is at direct odds with private profit and insurers hold ultimate power to decide who gets treatment, and where tens of millions go uninsured or underinsured and subject to financial ruin if they lose a job or get ill.

, ,

No Comments

Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act of 2008 or the TRADE Act of 2008.

A letter to Sander M. Levin, MI Chairman Subcommittee on trade of the Committee on Ways and Means

http://www.citizen.org/trade/tradeact/ (a copy of the bill)

Trade Reform
Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act of 2008 or the TRADE Act of 2008.

We as citizens of the Space Coast in Brevard Florida are grateful and are experiencing a greater sense of confidence in our nation ‘ s legislative process. This Bill, the TRADE Act of 2008 which strengthens the role of congress concerning trade and treaty agreements is a step in the right direction in congress reclaiming its Constitutional responsibility. For the past thirty years, we the citizens had lost confidence that trade agreements were concerned with ordinary citizens or the nation’s welfare economically and societally. We claim the basic foundation and primary purpose of United States trade and treaty agreements is the welfare of citizens and the nation. Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

S.637 Newspaper Revitalization Act

Sen. Benjamin Cardin [D, MD] introduced a bill in late March, to allow newspapers to restructure as non-profit organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the Federal tax code.  This bill could be one way for declining newspapers to abandon their current, failing,  for-profit model.

See the full text of the bill below.

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

H.R.1966 Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act

This bill, named after the 13 year old Missouri girl who committed suicide after being harassed on the social networking site MySpace.com, is sponsored by Rep. Linda Sánchez [D, CA-39]. The intent of the bill is to make online harassment, known as cyberbullying, punishable under Chapter 41 of title 18 of the United States Code. The section dealing with threats and harassment.

Proponents of the bill say it will protect children and teens while online, where anonymity makes harassment easier.

Opponents contend that the bill would threaten free speech online and that sufficient criminal and civil penalties already exist for such behavior.

Read the full text of the bill behind the cut.

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

G20 to address offshore banking

FINANCE: Tax Havens in Spotlight at G20 Meet
Lucy Komisar*
NEW YORK Mar 29 (IPS) - This could be the moment when a fatal
blow is delivered to the worlds tax havens. Or it could be
another largely cosmetic change that allows offshore financial
centres such as Switzerland the Cayman Islands and Liechtenstein
to deflect attacks on the system by sacrificing the few tax
miscreants that governments catch in their nets.
Decisions at the G20 government leaders meeting in London Apr. 2
will set the direction.
Financial centres with bank secrecy laws are blamed by the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development which
represents 30 developed economies for hiding some 5 to 7
trillion dollars offshore so the profits they produce evade
taxes. This costs the U.S. 100 billion dollars in taxes annually
says Michigan Senator Carl Levin who has introduced legislation
to combat offshore tax evasion. The numbers are guesses as bank
secrecy masks the figures. Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments