Archive for May, 2009
Will President Obama support the Fair Elections Now Act?
Posted by Fred Markham in Election Reform, Election Reform Opinions, Finance & Banking, Finance & Banking Opinions, Healthcare, Uncategorized on May 17th, 2009
Mandle suggests that Obama may become more receptive to the Clean Elections message, and may sign on to FENA, if his reform agenda is sufficiently thwarted by Congress (presumably if he also recognizes that the influence of private money is the main source of his frustration).
Trade
Posted by gwilson in Uncategorized on May 14th, 2009
Address of trade subcommittee members:
Committee on Ways and Means
Subcommittee on Trade
Sander M. Levin, MI Chairman
http://www.house.gov/levin/
John S. Tanner, TN
http://www.house.gov/tanner/
Chris Van Hollen, MD
http://vanhollen.house.gov/HoR/MD08/Home
Jim McDermott, WA
http://www.house.gov/mcdermott/
Richard E. Neal, MA
http://www.house.gov/mcdermott/
Lloyd Doggett, TX
http://www.house.gov/doggett/
Earl Pomeroy, ND
http://www.pomeroy.house.gov/
Bob Etheridge, NC
http://etheridge.house.gov/
Linda T. Sanchez, CA
http://lindasanchez.house.gov/
Kevin Brady, TX
http://www.house.gov/brady/
Geoff Davis, KY
http://geoffdavis.house.gov/
Dave G. Reichert, WA
http://reichert.house.gov/
Wally Herger, CA
http://www.house.gov/herger/
Devin Nunes, CA
http://nunes.house.gov/
Political Donors Drive the HealthCare Debate
Posted by Fred Markham in Election Reform, Healthcare on May 5th, 2009
I submitted this as a letter to the editor to several central FL newspapers this morning, in response to an email alert from Howard Dean.
Special interests and big money political donors are driving the health care debate away from public options that would ensure all Americans have access to good healthcare at costs they can afford. The NY Times editorial board wrote earlier this month, “Lobbyists and Congressional aides have discussed a possible compromise: Congress would authorize a new government-run insurance program, but it would come into existence only if certain conditions were met - if, for example, private insurers failed to rein in health costs by a certain amount after several years.” In other words, we have finally arrived at the opportunity to devise a desperately needed public health care option, only to find that our privately financed legislators are bending to the will of their special interest financiers in the insurance and health care industry. This is no compromise at all, but a political diversion that will continue private insurer control of health care for another generation: a system where public health is at direct odds with private profit and insurers hold ultimate power to decide who gets treatment, and where tens of millions go uninsured or underinsured and subject to financial ruin if they lose a job or get ill.
Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act of 2008 or the TRADE Act of 2008.
Posted by gwilson in Trade Opinions on May 4th, 2009
A letter to Sander M. Levin, MI Chairman Subcommittee on trade of the Committee on Ways and Means
http://www.citizen.org/trade/tradeact/ (a copy of the bill)
Trade Reform
Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act of 2008 or the TRADE Act of 2008.
We as citizens of the Space Coast in Brevard Florida are grateful and are experiencing a greater sense of confidence in our nation ‘ s legislative process. This Bill, the TRADE Act of 2008 which strengthens the role of congress concerning trade and treaty agreements is a step in the right direction in congress reclaiming its Constitutional responsibility. For the past thirty years, we the citizens had lost confidence that trade agreements were concerned with ordinary citizens or the nation’s welfare economically and societally. We claim the basic foundation and primary purpose of United States trade and treaty agreements is the welfare of citizens and the nation. Read the rest of this entry »